Friday, June 19, 2015

Understanding the Old and New Covenant




2 Corinthians 3:7-9

 7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:

 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?

 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.

I have quoted the scripture from Corinthians but though this subject is important for our understanding of all Pauls epistles and Hebrews the book I have in mind as this is written is galatians.

The church at Galatia was under attack. While Paul was busy elsewhere wolves had snuck in order to use the brethren for their own desire of recognition, honor, and a following.

These false teachers were claiming that they were showing the Galatians how to have a proper relationship with God. They taught that the gentiles were not in true covenant with God until they were circumcised.

Coming from Jerusalem; they claimed that they spoke with the authority of the original apostles and James the Lords brother and head pastor of the Jerusalem church.

If these men knew that James had addressed this issue is not known but we do know that the authority they claimed for their teaching was a lie.

James and Paul do not oppose each other in the least; despite the misunderstanding of some which has persisted for two thousand years. Paul has no desire to discard the teachings of Moses. In truth his teachings to the gentile church could be considered as commentary on Moses writings. James does not wish to add any source to salvation other than faith in Messiah alone.

The scripture makes witness to the fact that Jesus came to Israel to establish Gods new covenant; as prophesied by Jeremiah and others. This covenant is made with Israel but others are not excluded in old or new.

Under the old a man was required to have his foreskin circumcised if he desired to be included in the covenant. Under the new covenant the token of circumcision given to Abraham is fulfilled in the true circumcision of the heart.

The new and old are in reality the same. To explain what I mean by this I offer the following example.

My wife and I were married almost twenty four years ago. We received a marriage license, went to a court official, said our vows and ta da we were married.

I promised my wife that we would have a better ceremony later. Now as my twenty fifth anniversary is approaching I intend to keep my promise.

Laying aside my slackness in keeping my promise a great many things will be different this time.

The ceremony will be performed by a minister instead of a governor.

My childish understanding of what marriage means to my everyday life has matured into an understanding that my wife and I are sharing one life.

Our vows are not an oath to live up to but are a witness of what is living in our hearts.

In the old our actions and thoughts where on what and how to be married in the new we focus on why we are married.

The marriage relationship itself has not changed. There still must be faithfulness, compassion, a trust and submission to one another, and a desire to walk out our time on earth together if our marriage is to be more than in name only.

This is a very accurate picture of the two covenants. The way of life described and thought of as a standard in the old has not changed but instead become the natural result of the life in us. Righteousness is still righteousness but it has gone from being an imitation of Gods life to an emanation of Gods life in us.

Translate

Popular Posts